Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Wal-Mart: Our shoppers are running out of money


wal-mart, shopping, Mike DukeWal-Mart CEO Mike Duke (left) speaking to a gathering of industry watchers in New York on Wednesday. By Parija Kavilanz, senior writer


NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Wal-Mart's core shoppers are running out of money much faster than a year ago due to rising gasoline prices, and the retail giant is worried, CEO Mike Duke said Wednesday.
"We're seeing core consumers under a lot of pressure," Duke said at an event in New York. "There's no doubt that rising fuel prices are having an impact."
Wal-Mart shoppers, many of whom live paycheck to paycheck, typically shop in bulk at the beginning of the month when their paychecks come in.
Lately, they're "running out of money" at a faster clip, he said.
"Purchases are really dropping off by the end of the month even more than last year," Duke said. "This end-of-month [purchases] cycle is growing to be a concern.
Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500), which averages 140 million shoppers weekly to its stores in the United States, is considered a barometer of the health of the consumer and the economy.
To that end, Duke said he's not seeing signs of a recovery yet.
With food prices rising, Duke said Wal-Mart is charging customers more for some fresh groceries while reducing prices on other merchandise such as electronics.
Wal-Mart has struggled with seven straight quarters of sales declines in its stores.
Addressing that challenge, Duke said the company made mistakes by shrinking product variety and not being more aggressive on prices compared to its competitors.
"What's made Wal-Mart great over the decades is 'every day low prices' and our [product] assortment," he said. "We got away from it."
Now, with its strategy of low prices all the time back in place, Duke said making Wal-Mart a "one-stop shopping stop" is a critical response to dealing with the rising price of fuel.
Americans don't have the luxury of driving all over town to do their shopping.
Other than competing on prices and products, Duke said Wal-Mart is focused on leveraging technology -- especially social networking -- more aggressively to drive sales.
"Social networking is much more a part of the purchasing decision," he said. "Consumers are communicating with each other on Facebook about how they spend their money and what they're buying."
Elsewhere, Duke said Wal-Mart is exploring a number of e-commerce initiatives to grow the business such as testing an online groceries delivery business in San Jose. To top of page

Storm cuts path through South, killing 12

(CNN) -- Severe storms ripped through parts of the South on Wednesday, cutting a path of destruction from Texas to Tennessee that left at least 12 people dead and hundreds of thousands without power, authorities said.
Even as officials were assessing damage across the region, forecasters said another powerful storm packing high winds and the possibility of tornadoes was bearing down on portions of Mississippi, Alabama, north Georgia and eastern Tennessee.
"The storms are just amazingly explosive and they're covering a very large area," said Greg Carbin with the Weather Service Storm Center in Norman, Oklahoma.
Six people were killed in Alabama after storms moved through overnight and through the morning hours, according to the state Emergency Management Agency. One person was killed in Arkansas, officials in that state said.
Another five people were killed in storm-related incidents in Mississippi, according to the state Emergency Management Agency, which revised its death toll down from six earlier in the day.
Church steeple toppled by storm
Tornadoes, floods cripple Arkansas
RELATED TOPICS
"Our thoughts and prayers are with the families who lost loved ones or property in this devastating storm," said Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, who declared a state of emergency in 39 of the state's counties. The declaration allows the state to offer aid to the counties during recovery efforts.
Reports of people trapped in homes or overturned vehicles along with reports of downed power lines were coming in from nearly every state in the region, according to emergency management officials.
In Chattanooga, Tennessee, iReporter Erika Dunn said a tree fell on her great-aunt's home. She said her great-aunt reported the storm was so bad she could see a white wall of water coming toward the house. She was headed for her basement and was closing the door of her screened porch when the tree fell.
"It got really strong, really fast," Dunn said.
While no one was hurt in that incident, others across the South were not so lucky.
The state was also bracing for flooding along the Mississippi River,
In northeastern Alabama, there were reports of people trapped in homes in Marshall County after a possible twister touched down earlier in the day, said Lee Rosser, a logistics specialist for the county Emergency Management Agency.
Rescue crews were working to free a number of people trapped at Lake Guntersville State Park, where a number of RVs were parked at the time, said Yasamie August, a spokeswoman for the Alabama Emergency Management Agency.
The storm also damaged an airplane hangar at Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport, airport spokeswoman Toni Bass said. Passenger operations were not affected, she said.
Hundreds of thousands of people across the region were without power, including 269,000 in Birmingham, said Michael Sznajderman, spokesman for Alabama Power.
"We're chipping away" at restoring power, he said, but crews may be forced to halt work as a second line of storms approach.
CNN iReporter Paul Tinsley of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, said he and his wife were awakened overnight by "high winds that were picking up rapidly." He said they grabbed their dogs and ran to a downstairs bathroom. "I was convinced a tornado was seconds away from hitting the house," he said. "Luckily, that wasn't the case."
He said he left the house after the storm passed, and "there are an unbelievable amount of trees down in my neighborhood."
Meanwhile, the National Weather Service issued a tornado watch for portions of southeastern Arkansas, northeastern Louisiana and much of Mississippi until 7 p.m. (8 p.m. ET)

CHECK OUT MY WALLWISHER!

http://www.wallwisher.com/wall/chovy50

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Obama Approves Use of Predator Drones in Libya

The U.S. is not at war with Libya and has not taken sides, but President Obama nevertheless has signed off on the use of armed predator drones in the North African nation that has been torn by a weeks-old bloody conflict, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday.
"What the president has said that where we have some unique capabilities, he is going to use those, and in fact he has approved the use of armed predators, and I think today may have been in fact their first mission," he said.
The president approved the use of two unmanned aircraft around the clock to pick off targets in urban areas in Libya. The U.S. military tried to launch them Thursday but turned them back due to bad weather.
Obama already uses the drones to target terrorists along Pakistan's border with Afghanistan. Gates said the drones will enable more precise attacks against Col. Muammar Qaddafi's forces.
The move carries political risks as it could further alienate the president's anti-war base as he ramps up his re-election campaign. And several members of Congress already feel spurned by the president because he launched "limited" military operations without consulting them first. Stepping up the U.S. effort there could draw more ire from them.
Obama has gone to great lengths to portray the U.S. military as taking a backseat role in the international campaign, sanctioned by the United Nations, to protect Libyan citizens from Qaddafi's bloody crackdown on dissenters. 
But his efforts have been complicated by the stalemate in Libya, where the presence of a NATO-led mission has not been able to give the upper hand to rebel forces who have resembled the gang that couldn't shoot straight.
Gates pushed back against suggestions that the drones provides more evidence that the mission in Libya is expanding beyond its original goals – a development known as mission creep.
"I think that the president has been clear to us that the primary strike role has been turned over to our allies and our friends, and if we can make a modest contribution with these armed Predators, we'll do it, but I don't think any of us see that as mission creep," he said.
Gen. James Cartwright, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the use of drones will give the edge to the international forces in crowded urban areas, where they are struggling "to pick friend from foe." 
"So a vehicle like the Predator that can get down lower and can get ID's better helps us," he said.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Soccer's last taboo: Why gay players stay in the closet

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Anton Hysen, a fourth division Swedish footballer, recently declared he was gay
  • He became only the second professional footballer to do so
  • The first, Justin Fashanu, hanged himself in 1998
  • CNN looks at the reasons why sexuality remains the last taboo in football
London, England (CNN) -- An interview with a Swedish footballer playing in his home country's fourth tier usually only engages the interest of the most parochial of soccer fans, but when Anton Hysen agreed to speak to a local magazine last month, it unexpectedly created headlines from Brazil to China.
The 20-year old midfielder -- a former under-17 Swedish international now playing for Utsiktens BK of Gothenburg, a team that rarely attracts crowds of more than a few hundred -- made history as well as headlines.
"I am a footballer and [I am] gay. If I perform as a footballer, then I do not think it matters if I like girls or boys," he told Swedish football magazine Offside.
In a heartbeat Hysen became the world's only current professional footballer to go public on being gay, breaking the game's last taboo.
Homosexuality in professional sport remains a controversial issue. But as attitudes have changed, sportsmen and women like Martina Navratilova, arguably the greatest women's tennis player of all time, to basketball's John Amaechi, have publicly announced their sexuality despite the pressure from both the locker room and the prejudice of fans.
Yet whilst tennis, basketball, cricket and even rugby union have acknowledged the presence of gay players, football has been oddly, and stubbornly, resistant.
Davies talks to CNN about coming out
Gay rugby player speaks to CNN
Coming out of the closet in pro sports
Even in the past six months, for every Mario Gomez or Manuel Neur -- two German internationals who have urged gay players to go public -- there's a Vlatko Markovic, the head of the Croatian Football Federation, who told Croat newspaper Vercernji List that: "While I'm president of the Croatian Football Federation, there will be no homosexuals playing in the national team ... thankfully only normal people play football."
And FIFA president Sepp Blatter was caught out too when he joked that gay supporters should refrain from having sex at the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. Homosexuality is illegal in the emirate.

Football lags behind
But why is it that soccer, which has waged a largely successfully battle against racism and sexism in western Europe, remains one of the few bastions of homophobia in sport? The answer according to the "Justin Campaign" -- a group that campaigns for more tolerance for homosexuality in football -- is the fear of reprisals from fans.
"Football, with its roots in working-class male culture, has always had a far more aggressive and vocal support," explains spokesman Alan Duffy. "That's not to say that middle class people aren't racist or homophobic. Simply that often they will keep their views to themselves. Footballers receive crowd abuse for everything and anything. Fans now know not to openly express racist views at grounds. We need to get to a stage where they know that homophobic chanting is unacceptable too."
The campaign is named after the only other professional footballer, aside from Anton Hysen, who went public about their sexuality. Fashanu was a promising young English striker who in 1981 became Britain's first £1 million ($1.6 million)black player when he signed for then-European Cup winners Nottingham Forest.
In 1990 he came out after a British newspaper planned to run an expose of Fashanu's affair with a politician. But according to gay activist and friend Peter Tatchell, the pressure of leading a double life, coupled later with the abuse he received from supporters everywhere he played, left an indelible mark.
"During that decade of closeted double life he found it immensely difficult to cope with the strain of hiding his gayness in the macho world of football," he recalled. "Justin suffered racism too ... they would make monkey noises and gestures, and throw bananas on the pitch. But it was the anti-gay prejudice that ultimately dragged him down."
Fashanu never fulfilled his potential and drifted down the divisions. In 1998, after falsely believing that a warrant had been issued for his arrest in the U.S. following allegations of a sexual assault, Fashanu hanged himself. He was 37 years old.
According to the Justin Campaign, the experiences of Fashanu, and the vitriol it unleashed, has made it harder to persuade high-profile footballers to come out. Only last year, the English Football Association (FA) delayed the launch of a viral video tackling the issue of homophobia in the game when it emerged that every footballer and agent the FA approached had declined to endorse it.
"I suspect agents and clubs shied away from it," Peter Clayton, chair of the FA's Homophobia in Football advisory group, told British newspaper the Daily Mail. "A player coming forward to appear in it would feel he might ignite more vitriol."

Agents or fans?
Indeed, new research has suggested that it is the football clubs and football agents themselves, rather than the fans, that might be the real barrier to players coming out. Dr Ellis Cashmore, professor of culture media and sport at Staffordshire University, conducted an anonymous survey of over 3,000 fans and footballers, and discovered that 91% believed that only a player's performance on the pitch mattered, whilst just 9% believed that a player's sexuality posed a problem.
"Before we did the research the big homophobia barrier was fans and the players didn't want to confront hostile fans," Dr Cashmore told CNN. "But they [the fans surveyed] said that they thought it was the clubs, because no clubs want to take a risk because they feel it will hurt the brand of the club."
It was sentiment echoed by Max Clifford, a UK media impresario who last year revealed that he represented two gay Premier League footballers but urged them to stay in the closet.
"Do I think it's right? Of course not ... It's a very sad state of affairs. But it's a fact that homophobia in football is as strong now as 10 years ago."
Dr. Cashmore agrees. "They [football clubs and agents] have read Max Clifford's remarks. Agents make money from commission. Agents will ask players: 'We have $6.5 million in endorsement contracts, would it damage your reputation [to come out]?' It's how they think about this. By nature they are cautious. You have two conservative forces here. Clubs who are institutions and agents who want to protect their own income streams. Many of them reluctantly concede that perception."
The English FA believes it is now on the right track when it comes to dealing with homophobic abuse, perhaps even setting the stage for a footballer to follow Anton Hysen.
"The FA is communicating with experts in tackling homophobia on a regular basis ...there is an FA strategy in place to implement those over the next 12 months and beyond," explained the FA's Matt Phillips.
The next Hysen?
Some, like Dr. Cashmore, believe that far from being a barrier to earning money, an openly gay player would be able to significantly raise their profile, an experience borne out by the interest in Anton Hysen's story. But even with the changing attitudes in society, gay footballers still look as much to the experiences of Fashanu as Hysen.
"Would a player face the same vitriol as Justin? It's hard to say," said Duffy.
"He may well do. But there would be also many many more words of encouragement. Something that would help and something that Justin didn't get, unfortunately."

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Obama calls for $4 trillion in deficit reduction over 12 years

Click to play
Obama proposes $4 trillion deficit cut
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Obama says "doing nothing on the deficit is not an option"
  • The president aims to cut the federal debt by $4 trillion over the next 12 years
  • Obama calls for ending the Bush-era tax cuts for families making over $250,000
  • Obama says his plan will help to sharply limit Medicare cost increases
Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama unveiled his long-awaited deficit reduction plan Wednesday, calling for a mix of spending reductions and tax hikes that the White House claims would cut federal deficits by $4 trillion over the next 12 years without gutting popular programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.
Obama's plan includes a repeal of the Bush-era tax cuts on families making more than $250,000 annually -- something sought by Democrats but strongly opposed by Republicans. The president also called for the creation of a "debt fail-safe" trigger that would impose automatic across-the-board spending cuts and tax changes in coming years if annual deficits are on track to exceed 2.8% of the nation's gross domestic product.
CNNMoney: Transcript of president's speech

The president claimed that by building on or adjusting the health care reform bill passed last year, $480 billion would be saved by 2023, followed by an additional $1 trillion in the following decade. For example, he proposed tightly constraining the growth in Medicare costs starting in 2018.
"Doing nothing on the deficit is just not an option," Obama said in the speech at George Washington University, adding that "our debt has grown so large that we could do real damage to the economy if we don't begin a process now to get our fiscal house in order."
Obama's approach seeks to carve out a political middle ground between conservatives -- who are pushing for deficit reduction based solely on spending cuts and expected economic growth -- and liberals, who are generally resisting entitlement reform and seeking higher corporate and personal taxes.
Time: Will budget cuts kill the recovery?

Obama: How U.S. checkbook was damaged
Obama: We must all work together
GOP speaks out against proposed tax hike
How to auction off the nation's debt
He called for political leaders to put aside orthodox party ideology and work together for the good of the country, saying "we can solve this problem" while noting that "any serious plan to tackle our deficit will require us to put everything on the table, and take on excess spending wherever it exists in the budget."
At the same time, Obama blasted the House Republican 2012 budget proposal unveiled last week, saying it would "lead to a fundamentally different America than the one we've known throughout most of our history."
"These are the kind of cuts that tell us we can't afford the America that I believe in and that I think you believe in," Obama said of the plan by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin, who sat in the audience Wednesday. "I believe it paints a vision of our future that's deeply pessimistic. "
The administration's package stands in sharp contrast to Ryan's blueprint, which calls for cutting the debt by $4.4 trillion over the next decade while radically overhauling Medicare and Medicaid and dropping the top personal and corporate tax rate to 25%.
GOP leaders, who were briefed by Obama at the White House before the speech, harshly criticized the president's call for higher taxes on wealthier Americans.
McConnell: Meeting with Obama was "constructive"

"Any plan that starts with job-destroying tax hikes is a non-starter," said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. "Republicans are fighting for meaningful spending cuts and fighting against any tax increases on American small businesses."
Ryan said he was "very disappointed" in the president. "What we heard today was a political broadside from our campaigner-in-chief," he said. "Rather than building bridges, he's poisoning wells."
Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, said the president's tax proposal set "a new standard for class warfare."
Under the Obama plan, Pentagon spending would fall by roughly $400 billion by 2023, while federal pensions, agricultural subsidies and other domestic programs would also face the budget ax, according to the White House.
In total, nonsecurity discretionary spending -- Washington jargon for the 12 percent of the federal budget aside from defense spending, debt payments and the big entitlements such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security -- would be cut by a total of $770 billion over the next 12 years.
GOP senators propose raising Social Security age
The $770 billion figure is in line with recommendations put forward by Obama's bipartisan debt reduction commission last December, according to the White House.
Obama's plan contained no specific proposal for Social Security, the government-run pension plan that will run out of money in coming decades. The president does not believe that the program "is in crisis (or) is a driver of our near-term deficit problems," a White House statement noted.
Budget deal details revealed
What's on the budget chopping block?
Carney: 'Tough choices' with budget deal
Sessions: 'What we need is numbers'
But Social Security does face "long-term challenges that are better addressed sooner than later," the statement added, and Obama expressed a willingness to consider changes to help the program maintain its solvency down the road.
Obama said Vice President Joe Biden would begin meeting with legislators from both parties in early May with the aim of forging agreement on a deficit reduction plan by the end of June. According to the White House, the meetings would include eight Congress members and eight senators -- equally split between the two parties.
Zelizer: Can Obama resist the GOP?

The president, however, strongly opposed the proposed Medicare and Medicaid overhaul outlined in Ryan's 2012 GOP budget proposal.
Under Ryan's plan, the government would stop directly paying Medicare bills for senior citizens in 2022. Instead, recipients would choose a plan from a list of private health insurance providers, which the federal government would subsidize. Individuals currently 55 or older would not be affected by the changes.
Medicaid, which provides health care for the disabled and the poor, would be transformed into a series of block grants to the states. Republicans believe state governments would spend the money more efficiently and would benefit from increased flexibility, while Democrats warn that such a move would shred the health care security provided to the most vulnerable Americans in recent generations.
"I will not allow Medicare to become a voucher program that leaves seniors at the mercy of the insurance industry, with a shrinking benefit to pay for rising costs," Obama said. "I will not tell families with children who have disabilities that they have to fend for themselves. We will reform these programs, but we will not abandon the fundamental commitment this country has kept for generations."
What's driving the debt debate?

The Republican "vision is less about reducing the deficit than it is about changing the basic social compact in America," the president asserted. "It ends Medicare as we know it."
At the same time, Obama said that Democrats also must recognize the need for significant change in America's fiscal structure and practices.
"To those in my own party, I say that if we truly believe in a progressive vision of our society, we have the obligation to prove that we can afford our commitments," the president said. "If we believe that government can make a difference in people's lives, we have the obligation to prove that it works -- by making government smarter, leaner and more effective."
What would the Tea Party cut?

As Obama and the Republicans spar over long-term deficit reduction plans, they also need to tackle the budget for the remainder of the current fiscal year, which ends September 30.
The House is scheduled to vote Thursday on a deal reached late last week that would cut spending for the year by $38.5 billion.
The package cuts funding for a wide range of domestic programs and services, including high-speed rail, emergency first responders and the National Endowment for the Arts.
Under the terms of the deal, roughly $20 billion would be taken from discretionary programs while nearly $18 billion would come from what are known as "changes in mandatory programs," or CHIMPS, which involve programs funded for multiyear blocks that don't require annual spending approval by Congress.
Republicans generally opposed CHIMP cuts because they affect only one year, with funding returning to the preauthorized level in the following year.
Democrats and Republicans also have to contend with an impending vote to raise the nation's debt ceiling. Congress needs to raise the limit before the federal government reaches its legal borrowing limit of $14.29 trillion later this spring or risk a default that could result in a crashing dollar and spiraling interest rates, among other things.
CNNMoney: Debt ceiling is next big deadline

Republicans have repeatedly stressed that any vote to raise the cap has to be tied to another round of spending cuts or fiscal reforms.
The administration, in contrast, has called for a "clean" vote on the cap, which would raise the limit without adding any conditions. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney has warned that trying to force the issue is tantamount to playing a game of "chicken" with the economy.
While meeting with reporters after his meeting with Obama, however, Boehner indicated that the president might be open to a compromise on that vote.
CNN's Dana Bash, Dan Lothian, and Deirdre Walsh contributed to this r

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Former Egyptian President Mubarak hospitalized

Mubarak (pictured in 2008) had back surgery in Germany in 2004, and returned there in 2010 to have his gall bladder removed.
Mubarak (pictured in 2008) had back surgery in Germany in 2004, and returned there in 2010 to have his gall bladder removed.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: Egyptian state television reports Mubarak had a heart attack
  • Mubarak has had health problems in the recent past
  • He had back surgery in 2004 and his gall bladder was removed in 2010
  • Mubarak stepped down from power on February 11
Cairo (CNN) -- Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak was admitted to a hospital Tuesday, according to a spokesman for the Egyptian military.
Egyptian state television reported Mubarak suffered a heart attack during questioning over possible corruption charges. When contacted by CNN, however, the prosecutor's office denied any reports Mubarak had been questioned by authorities Tuesday.
Mubarak was hospitalized at Sharm el-Sheikh International Hospital, state media reported.
Mubarak had back surgery in Germany in 2004, and returned there in 2010 to have his gall bladder removed. He had largely withdrawn from public view in recent years, until this year's uprising prompted him to make televised speeches.
Mubarak stepped down February 11 and handed over power to the military, his nearly three decades of iron rule ended by a groundswell of popular protests that began January 25.

Lady Gaga falls during Houston concert

Lady Gaga took a monster of a fall during her concert in Houston on Sunday, but the stumble didn't slow her down at all.
While performing her song "You and I," Gaga was standing with one foot on the keys of her blazing piano and another foot on the piano's bench when she suddenly lost her balance and the bench toppled over, sending Gaga tumbling down onto her back.
The 25-year-old managed to hold on to her mic, and crawled out from underneath the piano still singing.
One concertgoer, who videotaped the fall, told the Daily Mail that she was "really high up and it looked really bad. I only just managed to keep the video steady. The crowd all saw it and I don't think anyone would have minded is she'd walked off the stage to get checked out by medics. But she was a real professional and jumped back up on stage to finish her set in front of the fans. It was really amazing to see."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mLpOWeNKVQ&feature=player_embedded

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Fierce attacks leave public workers stinging

They take away your trash. They protect your homes, your property and your families. They put out your fires and they educate your children. And somehow, in the past year or so, the uniforms many of them wear have grown a bull's-eye on the back. Or at least that's how they feel.
After the worst recession since the Great Depression, as state and local governments struggle to meet budgets with dwindling revenues, public union workers have become targets of politicians, pundits and ordinary citizens who think their salaries are too high and their jobs too cushy.
That has left many public union workers feeling misunderstood.
“We make $35,000 a year, and they want to throw stones at public workers,” said Roland Bell, 44, a sanitation worker in Wilmington, Del. "They don’t know half of what our jobs entail.”
  1. Faces of the public sector
    1. The end of an era?
      Public union workers have become targets of politicians, pundits and ordinary citizens who think their salaries are too high and their jobs too cushy.
    2. Loud and clear
      A Connecticut fire dispatcher says his union wages have kept him solidly 'lower middle class." But, he says, "I didn’t take this job to get rich."
    3. Trash talk
      A Delaware sanitation worker considers taking a second job to make ends meet. He bemoans shrill anti-union talk: "They don’t know half of what our jobs entail."
    4. Taught a lesson
      A Wisconsin teacher wonders — four years into the career she's wanted her entire life — if she made the right choice as the state attacks her union.
Bell's hurt feelings and anger are being echoed across the country as unionized workers defend their pay and benefits from attacks by legislators in state after state. Undeterred by protests in some state capitals, lawmakers have moved forward with efforts to cut costs by reducing worker pay and benefits or gutting collective bargaining rights.
“Several things came together that have resulted in the fiercest attack on public workers that I can remember,” said Harley Shaiken, a professor at University of California at Berkeley who specializes in labor issues.
The campaign to curtail public union power has played out in a wide variety of state moves:
• In Wisconsin, Republican lawmakers have pushed through a law that severely curtails many union workers’ collective bargaining rights and asks most public workers to contribute more to pensions and health insurance. The effort has been stalled by legal challenges, however, and an effort to recall politicians who voted for it is under way.
• In Ohio, a Republican-backed bill to restrict public union workers’ rights to strike and bargain collectively has moved through the Legislature. Democrats and union workers are planning to fight it with a referendum.
• In Indiana, Democrats fled the state for five weeks to protests proposals that they saw as restricting worker rights and lowering wages. They returned only after gaining some concessions from Republicans.
• In Idaho, a bill restricting public teachers’ bargaining rights has already passed.
• In Florida, Gov. Rick Scott recently signed into law a bill that limits teachers to one-year contracts and bases merit pay in part on how much improvement students show.
• In Maine, the newly elected Republican governor Paul LePage ordered the removal of a mural depicting the state’s labor history because it was at odds with his administration’s pro-business agenda.
"Workers and employers need to work together to create opportunity for Maine’s 50,000 unemployed," said Adrienne Bennett, LePage's press secretary, in a statement. "We understand that not everyone agrees with this decision, but the Maine Department of Labor has to be focused on the job at hand."
The proposals have left workers grappling with potential pay and benefit cuts, changes to working conditions and accusations that they don’t work hard. For some, it’s been enough to question whether they want to continue in careers they love if it means facing insults and pay cuts.
“This isn’t the career that my mom went into 35 years ago,” said Greta Voit, 27, a high school physics teacher in New Berlin, Wis. The push has been spurred by the recession and housing bust, which has left many state and city governments in the red and desperate to cut costs.
Some lawmakers also have argued that a good way to keep costs down in the long term is to curtail public union workers’ collective bargaining rights, the basic tool used by organized labor  to negotiate everything from retirement pay to working conditions.
Opponents contend the movement is just a ruse to break unions.
Politicians versus unions In some states, the austerity proposals have divided two interest groups that often co-exist in relative peace: public workers and politicians.
Shaiken said that in better budgetary times many politicians didn’t think it was necessary or wise to pick a fight with powerful union forces, or to risk an anti-union effort that might be publicly challenged. As a result, only a few state houses took on public unions in a major way.
“Private-sector employers … have been able to be much more aggressive in anti-union campaigns than public employers are,” said Joseph Slater, a professor of law and values at the University of Toledo College of Law in Ohio.
The percentage of private-sector workers represented by unions has been on the decline for many years, falling from 18.8 percent in 1983 to 7.7 percent as of last year. Many big unions, such as those in the auto industry, have had to accept major concessions in recognition of the weak economy and the growing ability of employers to move work overseas.
In the public sector, however, the percentage of union-represented workers has dropped only slightly since the mid-1980s, to its current level of 40 percent. That includes workers who are not formally union members but are represented by unions for the purposes of contract negotiations.
Americans in general have similar feelings about public and private sector unions. A survey conducted in February by the Pew Research Center found that the same percentage of Americans — 48 percent — view both public and private unions favorably. Forty percent of those surveyed viewed public unions unfavorably, while 37 percent viewed private unions unfavorably.
The relative strength of public-sector unions is based on more than just political calculations. A private-sector employer facing a potential union drive often can threaten to move their operations to another state or even country, or to outsource the job itself to another employer.